Alright cool thx. And you do have a good point on the abiogenesis subject, though that doesn't mean its necessarily correct. I'm sure there are scientists experimenting and trying to prove abiogenesis correct still. Though I'm sure you have more knowledge on this subject than me.

One thing that really irritates me though: The fact that with many important things, there are always two sides to the problem. A person could just as easily accept one side as the other. I was in debate this year and each team would always have evidence going directly against the other teams' evidence. This doesn't make sense, since one of them had to be correct, but it always happens nonetheless.

So whenever there are two equally good sides to an argument, I see no point in continuing. (Unfortunately, in debate you HAVE to keep arguing)