Romans 14-16
Jan. 5th, 2011 10:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Vegetarians and meat-eaters should get along and not judge each other because God will judge us all.
Paul takes his leave of Rome and plans to head back to Jerusalem, handing over to a variety of men and women who have helped him and warning the converts to avoid people who may disagree with them (don't want to be hearing any differing opinions while still establishing your new religion).
Paul takes his leave of Rome and plans to head back to Jerusalem, handing over to a variety of men and women who have helped him and warning the converts to avoid people who may disagree with them (don't want to be hearing any differing opinions while still establishing your new religion).
Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-05 11:09 pm (UTC)Paul is radically redefining it for both.
He is teaching that it is more important to get along and focus on the things to which we all agree than it is to be right, sometimes.
This should be looked at as the teaching of tolerance.
In todays terms the debate may be about homosexuals.
On one hand you will have people citing scripture saying that the law says it's an abomination and even using Paul himself to say it's condemned behavior.
On the other hand you have people who love God and love others clearly trying to live a right and moral life before God saying that they are right with God and that Paul and Leviticus are being twisted into something more than they were intended.
Romans 14 here suggests that as believers they should be accepted and not Judged if it is "disputable".
Most Christians and non-christians may think Romans 14 is about pork...but they would miss a very profound and valuable lesson here.
That being two fold:
1. It's not good to judge.
2. It's not good to create stumbling blocks.
Paul tells us Jesus will resolve ALL disputes in due time and that each of us will be accountable for our own actions.
So in a very real sense the debate over homosexuality should be is the statement "Gay people will go to hell" disputable.
Which is why many Gay people will point to the studies and evidence that suggest being Gay is a natural and real experience that some people have and it is not a choice.
If their argument is true we can safely say that the statement is disputable because God does not create people doomed to hell.
If it can be proven that it is not biological but a choice of a deviant lifestyle then the statement holds and ~600 million people on this Earth will be going to hell for choosing that life.
Personally, I am going to side with research and peoples word and if I am wrong then they will still answer to Jesus.
May God bless everyone who wants his blessings and love!
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 12:08 am (UTC)There are so many things wrong with this comment. But you make me so angry I don't even care to try and be rational with you and pick you apart. That doesn't make you "right". In fact, all you and I both have is conjecture about any 'god-given' laws, as he hasn't come down from heaven recently enough to set us straight.
So. Since you're convinced your bigoted, asshole opinion is right, I'm just going to go ahead and call you a bigoted asshole and say I'm right. There have been a lot of comments on here that scream self-righteous, but yours is the worst I've seen so far. You are a bad Christian, and you should feel bad. But you won't. Ever. You'll just continue to sit in your nice cushioned church pews every Sunday and look down your nose at the "sexual deviant" gay people and make their lives difficult and their love invalid just because the concept offends you.
I hope someday there are Christian hate-crimes. Where Christians get to experience being beat outside their homes, unable to marry, unable to express love in public, are raped to be "corrected" of their lifestyle, where their parents disown them, bosses fire them, and they're not able to spend their last minutes of life with their partners or priests because hospital staff are composed of angry, bigoted homosexuals who refuse basic rights to Christians.
I hope you feel good about yourself.
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 12:52 am (UTC)Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 01:15 am (UTC)Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 02:02 am (UTC)did paul actually targeting the teachings of peter and james?
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 09:32 pm (UTC)1 Corinthians 6:2
Is it not certain that the saints will be the judges of the world? if then the world will be judged by you, are you unable to give a decision about the smallest things?
3 Is it not certain that we are to be the judges of angels? how much more then of the things of this life?
So, he may, in fact, think he has every right to judge the people around him. (Or her)
Don't ever be misled to believe that the Bible doesn't back up the bigotry, hatred and intolerance that Christianity seems to have, in spite of the constant assertions by it's followers that Jesus was the Prince of Peace. In fact, he himself stated quite clearly otherwise:
"34“Don’t imagine that I came to bring peace to the earth! I came not to bring peace, but a sword.
35‘I have come to set a man against his father,
a daughter against her mother,
and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.
36Your enemies will be right in your own household!’l
37“If you love your father or mother more than you love me, you are not worthy of being mine; or if you love your son or daughter more than me, you are not worthy of being mine. 38If you refuse to take up your cross and follow me, you are not worthy of being mine." (Matt 10:34-38)
I'm really not being snarky, but deadly serious when I say, they really are just doing what they are told. So. Take it for what it's worth.
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 10:24 pm (UTC)I still choose to get angry. For my health, it's actually better than being passive.
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-07 02:44 am (UTC)Peace.
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 04:08 pm (UTC)Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-06 05:00 pm (UTC)2) If said Christian can say horrible things in the name of Jesus freely, I can state my angry opinion of their behavior freely.
3) The behavior of Christians reflects against their god and religion. Meaning what I see here is "God Hates Fags". Which equals, god hates, even though I know he doesn't because the bible says so.
4) My post is just as fucking offensive and judgmental as the one I commented on. I don't have to take any kind of 'higher moral ground' by being less so.
5) If freedom of speech means bigoted assholes can try to dictate what happens in the lives of my gay friends/family, then I'm free to be angry knowing partners of twelve years in my life can't marry because there are loudmouth assholes like that commenter who think it's god's will to try and butt in and tear apart lives in the name of Jesus. And I'm going to spend two minutes of my time reminding them just how many people have died rather than live because of their actions of hate.
6) There are Christian commenters I respect a lot, such as
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-07 07:52 pm (UTC)Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-10 05:57 pm (UTC)You "hope" for something that already exists. One has to wonder why anyone would "hope" these things. Christian or not, common ground is found in our humanity. Do you hope for a homosexual crusade of sorts? The same sort that the "Christians" and "Muslims" engaged in?
-Josh
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-10 06:17 pm (UTC)And a homosexual crusade would be filled with rainbows and ribbons, unlike religious crusades which enjoy bloodshed and conquering. Despite what people believe, the "gay agenda" is just having equal rights as a heterosexual, not taking over the world.
Re: Your take is pretty far off from what is said.
Date: 2011-01-25 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-06 02:03 am (UTC)Good on ya
Date: 2011-01-06 02:58 pm (UTC)Ian (I hate anonymous posts, I just don't have an account w livejournal yet, will do so today!)